The Nike Free as a Useful Tool for
Video-Gait Analysis
By Bruce R. Wilk, PT, OCS; Sokunthea Nau, DPT; and Daniel A.
DeLeon
In recent years running has
increased in popularity and just like with any physical
activity, injuries inevitably will occur. The majority of the
injuries observed are attributed to the overuse of the
musculoskeletal system. In order to treat these injuries, the
use of video-gait analysis on a treadmill has been implemented
to observe the mechanism of injury. The best technique to
observe the underlying condition would be to observe the patient
running barefoot, but the safety issues associated with running
barefoot on a treadmill do not make it a favorable technique.
Two years ago, we began using
the Nike Free running shoe in conjunction with video-gait
analysis. The Nike Free allows the feet to move through their
natural range of motion which creates the feeling and effects of
running barefoot. The Free design also helps overcome the safety
issues attributed with barefoot treadmill running without
hindering the analyzing process.
We incorporated the shoe into
analysis at two locations: the Orthopedic Rehabilitation
Specialist, where Bruce Wilk is a senior physical therapist; and
a running specialty shop, the Runner’s High, which is owned and
managed by Wilk. Both facilities are equipped with video- gait
analysis equipment, including a treadmill and video camera with
monitor. This equipment is used to evaluate and consider
possible corrective measures for both rehab patients and
customers. The key is to observe the patient running at pace
while using the Nike Free shoes because they do not change the
visual observation of the underlying problem.
Researchers have suggested
that runners may be harming themselves by wearing more
supportive footwear, a perk of modem technology Increased
support was added to compensate for the strains paved surfaces
create on the foot when running, and runners searched for a shoe
that helped make these forces bearable. Shoe companies knew that
in order to sell shoes, they would have to have the reputation
of having the latest and greatest technology available in
footwear. The constant competition among companies led to some
pretty radical ideas, and the creation of many sensible
technologies to help millions run safely and comfortably.
The implementation of more
cushion and supportive features in shoe design definitely has
benefits but it has also contributed to atrophy of the muscles
in the foot. The increased support has allowed the muscles to
neglect their jobs as the natural supportive structures of the
foot. Modern footwear may also be at fault for creating balance
issues and abnormal changes to a human’s natural gait. Nike
attempted to address this issue by creating a shoe that mimics
barefoot running; thus, the Nike Free was born. The Free was
designed to allow the foot to move freely through its natural
range of motion by removing all supportive components. In turn,
the body would have to adapt by increasing muscular strength and
tone. The Free’s exceptional design lent itself to be used as an
integral part of video-gait analysis because it does not hinder
the foot’s natural movements, which even the least supportive
shoe can.
A tremendous amount of force
is applied to the entire body during running activities. These
forces are focused mainly on the foot and ankle then continue
through the leg and up the body. Because the foot is the
foundation of the body, a misalignment of the subtalar joint can
lead to further complication elsewhere. Corrective measures must
be taken in order to correct or even prevent a pathological
condition from occurring. This is why we incorporated the Nike
Free into video-gait analysis. Experience tells us the Free is a
very good tool that can help determine which corrective shoe
would best address the underlying subtalar issue. The subtalar
conditions the Free allows you to observe include overpronation,
supination, and any other gait abnormalities attributed to a
subtalar condition.
If the Nike Free is such a
great tool to mimic the natural biomechanics of the foot, then
why not just observe the patient running barefoot on a treadmill
during analysis? There are many safety issues attributed to
barefoot running due to the dynamic accelerating forces
generated by the treadmill upon initial heel strike. In
addition, the majority of people would find running barefoot
uncomfortable. Although they provide minimal support, the Nike
Free still provides a barrier between the floor and the foot.
This enables the individual to run naturally without the pain
and possible dangers associated with barefoot running.
Based on our observations over
the last two years, we contend that the Nike Free, when used
with video-gait analysis, allows for proper assessment of
running biomechanical abnormalities that contribute to injury.
This in turn allows for proper corrective measure to be taken.
We are not sure if the Nike Free will ever take the place of
corrective shoes, but are optimistic that future research may
find new applications for these shoes. In addition to its
possible training applications, the Nike Free is an excellent
tool for assessing running biomechanics on a treadmill.
Bruce R. Wilk, PT OCS, and Sokunthea Nau, DPI are physical
therapists and Daniel A. DeLeon is a physical therapy aide at
Orthopedic Rehabilitation Specialist in Miami Florida.
REFERENCES
Can barefoot technology improve your customer’s running
experience?
Performance Sports Retailer. June 2007.
Foster JB. Barefoot-like designs challenge footwear conventions.
Biomechanics 2007; 16:21-27
Yessis M. Running barefoot vs. running in shoes.
AMAA Quarterly 1998; 12:5-7.
|